|
|
:: Friday, July 22, 2005 ::
Make Way for the Spinpeople
With a society afflicted by spinspeak, lookspin and soundspin, it was inevitable that we would sooner or later have spinpeople.
And now we do. According to the Wall Street Journal ("Who Did Her Personality?"), one of the latest, highly-paid “professions” is lifestyle designing – the spinning of an entirely new and presumably superior, improved and fashionable persona based on “make-over” selections by your personal life-style designer. These include on the short list: your clothes, accessories, cars, restaurants, menu choices, residences, furniture, tableware, personal trainers and exercise equipment, travel, hotels, and all special event arrangements such as weddings, funerals and dinner parties.
Not a bad package for only $450 an hour.
It is not clear where or how you get credentialed as a lifestyle designer. The WSJ reports “the barrier to entering the field…is relatively low.” It says “backgrounds range from bankers to former swimsuit models…some have degrees in fashion or the arts”
Presumably, the resulting spinpeople have already acquired a full spinspeak vocabulary along with plenty of soundspin and lookspin. If not, plenty of that expertise is certainly available.
:: James Baar 7/22/2005 04:57:00 PM [+] ::
...  
:: Monday, July 18, 2005 ::
Spinning the Latest Language Corruption Gambit
When the Red Sox beat the Yankees, even the most ardent Yankee fans did not suggest that their team’s problem was lousy communications.
No one in the mournful New York bars believed that all that was needed was an expensive language adjustment to darken the skies over Boston with Yankee homerun hits.
Not so, the liberal Democrats: the spinspeak mantra – we just need "better communications" – has been trotted out continually since the Democratic debacle in the 1994 congressional elections. As Hillary Clinton put it: “We failed to articulate the vision.”
The latest communications salvation magic being sought by Democratic liberals is to be achieved by the magic of “framing“ -- a cloudy form of Hegelian superspin that supposedly will win the day by incorporating a lot of ordinary spin that isn't working into a much bigger, broader spinball that the voters might like better.
The NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE (“The Framing Wars” by Matt Bai) reports that the Democratic leaders particularly like the concept because the roots of “framing theory” lie in the academic jungle thickets of linguistics. As Bai points out: “If you wanted Democrats to pay attention, who better to do the job than an egghead from Berkeley (Prof. George Lakoff) with an armful of impenetrable journal studies…”
But Bai, who clearly understands the difference between spin and fact-based substance, notes: “The right words can frame an argument, but they will never stand in its place.”
:: James Baar 7/18/2005 04:11:00 PM [+] ::
...
|
